Development [1]: Shepway Council claims no evidence in Lydd Airport Inquiry suggested their decision over planning was wrong [2]
Posted by editor on Sep 21, 2011 - 05:35 AM
[3]
|
In their closing statement to the Lydd Airport Inquiry on 16
September, Shepway District Council stated it's position remained one of
strong support for the applications by London Ashford Airport Limited
for permission for a runway extension and a new passenger terminal at LAA, Lydd. |
 |
|
In conclusion they stated that there was nothing in the material which had
been presented at the Inquiry which suggested that the Council was wrong
in its decision that planning permission should be granted. Rather, the
evidence strongly suggests that the Council's decision was correct, and
that this limited expansion on the existing airport should be allowed.
A spokesman for Lydd Airport’s senior management team said they were
very pleased that the public inquiry had provided the opportunity for a
full and comprehensive debate to take place about its multi-million
investment plans for developing the airport.
“Lydd Airport is confident that we have provided overwhelming evidence
to show that our applications to develop the site accord with national
and local policies and would not have an adverse impact on the integrity
of the internationally-designated sites of wildlife and ecological
importance, or a significant adverse effect on sites of national and
local ecological importance.
“We are also confident that our evidence to the inquiry has clearly
demonstrated the economic and job-creation benefits of our plans in
serving as a catalyst in the regeneration of Romney Marsh and the wider
Shepway community.
“Our applications have been subject to a thorough and comprehensive
determination process lasting a number of years and the democratically
elected members of Shepway District Council reviewed, examined and
questioned the applications and resolved to grant planning permission.
“The proposed planning control measures to be contained in a Section 106
Agreement would result in a more restricted operation of the airport
than is currently the case and would provide significant ecological
enhancements.
“We remain confident that the planning inspector’s report will recommend
the approval of the development and we look forward to a positive
outcome when the Secretary of State makes the final decision,” the spokesman added.
Hawkinge Gazette and Channel Coast News 2011©

|
Comments