0

  HOME | News PLUS | Letters | Comments | Calendar | Contact us | About us | Search

  Webfeed    Topic feeds  

   Traffic reports | Local info | Sport | BBC Kent | UK News | Polls | Advertise | Out and About | Site map

Free updates by Email  

News

[ Latest Stories | Categories | News Archive ]

Support for third Dungeness Nuclear Power Station from Howard

Posted by editor on Nov 19, 2009 - 08:45 AM
Filed under: Politics, Howards Way

Howards Way


Howard's Way.... a weekly column from the Rt. Hon. Michael Howard QC. MP.

19 November 2009

Concerns over the decision of the Energy Secretary to exclude Dungeness from the list of preferred sires for new nuclear power stations continues to grow.

I have received many letters and emails reflecting the puzzlement with which many local people have greeted this announcement.

Since I wrote about it last week I have had a better opportunity to study the Government’s reasoning in detail. Annexe F of the Government’s Consultation Document sets out the assessment of the suitability of Dungeness in some detail.

It took into account the demographics of the area and the proximity of the Lydd Training Area and found that they did not constitute any valid reason for rejecting the site. Similar considerations, and a similar conclusion, relate to the proximity of the airport.

On the risk of flooding, tsunami and storm surge, the Environment Agency advised that there is potential to protect the site. It reached a similar conclusion on the need to protect the site from coastal erosion.

The sole reason, therefore, for the rejection of Dungeness was the effect that a new station would have on the ecology of the site. The site is considered to be of European nature conservation importance and therefore of particular need of protection.

But the conclusion of the assessment was that “only some impacts on European sites could be avoided or mitigated and that compensation for remaining impacts would be difficult.”

It did not conclude that such compensation would be impossible. And, as we know, there are two nuclear stations already on the site, surely a factor of major significance.

The good news is that the Government’s decision is provisional.

There is now a consultation exercise which concludes on 22 February 2010.

I shall certainly be making my representations. After all, the Secretary of State confirmed to me in the House of Commons last week that the Government would carefully consider all representations and that Natural England would not have a veto.

If you want to join in, responses should be sent to:-

Robin Clarke
OPM
252b Gray’s Inn Road
London
WC1X 8XG

Fax: 0845 055 1700 (FAO Robin Clarke)
Email: energynpsconsultation@opm.co.uk

 


 

Comments

Display Order
New Build at Dungeness is most unlikely before 2025 if ever
by barriebotley
on Nov 21, 2009
[ _USERINFO ] [ _SENDAMSG ]

(Hawkinge Gaz.14 Nov) On the subject of nuclear new build.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown said that Dungeness will not be completely ruled out.

Mr Brown went on to say: “We only announced the first round, therefore the chance of this happening here is still something that has got to be looked at for the future."

At the same time MP Michael Howard has said he would fight the Government’s decision to scrap plans for a new nuclear power station at Dungeness.

I think Gordon Brown and Michael Howard are trying to score election Brownie points here.

I attended a meeting with The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) in London last Tuesday (17th Nov) where we (KARE), alongside other NGO's, The Environment Agency, HSE and Nuclear Regulators discussed the New Nuclear Build Proposals. I spoke to two of DECC’s senior representatives about the possible reversal of the decision to exclude Dungeness from the 'New Build' list that Gordon and Michael are so keen to do.

I am told that Natural England (and others) put forward such a strong case that it was impossible under the EU Habitats Directive to include Dungeness.

Since the 'B' station was built the Dungeness SSSI has had more important statuses designated. It is now an SPA (Special Protection Area) an SAC (Special Area for Conservation) which are part of the Natura 2000 network and it is also a proposed 'Ramsar Site'- an area of protected wetlands.

Also, the Government are satisfied that the 10 selected sites will be more than adequate to meet our electricity needs until 2025 (even if 1 or 2 sites fall off the list for any reason).

So, 'For the future', as Gordon says, well that’s no sooner than 2025, and only then if the SSSI status of Dungeness is diminished and the sea has not taken over.

Nil Points for that one I'm afraid Gordon or Michael.

Barrie Botley

Kent Against a Radioactive Environment (KARE)


Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in

 

Find it fast

  • Home
  • Just local news
  • Just letters
  • Just comments
  • News archive
  • About us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Search
 
 

 
 

 
 

+ Bookmark

Email us localrags@gmail.com


Please follow the instructions to add us to your bookmarks... Thank you...

 
 

Members

 

  • New account registration
  • Lost password recovery
 
 

Find your HOLIDAY bargains here!

 
 

Community Centre Specials!

 
 

Top Ten stories...

.....read more Stories...

 
 

VISIT US ON FACEBOOK.....

 

© 2012 Hawkinge Gazette. Design by Flashdaweb RSS RSS | Atom Atom | Terms of use | Contact | Zikula | YAML |