News

Dear Editor,

Re: 'Problems with dog fouling and a general deterioration of the whole area

Several points in Mr. Cameron's comments are beyond dispute but others need challenging.

1.It is true that there has never been a public right of way nor a legal thoroughfare. However there has certainly been a footpath for at least 10 years whose use up to this year had been encouraged by Shepway District Council (SDC) who mowed the route.

2. I have no doubt that Mr. Cameron's statement about the plans is true.

3. Would the Camerons deny that they have used 'unauthorized' access to this area via their garden gate? Deny that they have excercised their dogs here and continued on towards Killing Wood? Would they also claim that their two lovely but large dogs have never fouled the area?

4.The majority of walkers have not used the area outside the fenced area. The way next to the fence is extremely rough and often blocked with garden debris. The top of the bank is overgrown, rough and will become blocked as the dense planting of the bank (which includes rambling roses, holly and other prickles) continues to grow. This route is currently having enforced use by those physically able and there are plenty who cannot manage this. I have used the bank once. My dog objected to the prickles and nettles and now refuses to go up there.

5.This is related to issue 1. and many hope that SDC will review their policy.

6.Some residents backing onto this area claim that they were not consulted and were surprised to find themselves fenced in. Hawkinge residents of the wider community affected by this exclusion are not in agreement with SDC's action and are hoping that they will be consulted and the matter reviewed.

Peter Brun