0

  HOME | News PLUS | Letters | Comments | Calendar | Contact us | About us | Search

  Webfeed    Topic feeds  

   Traffic reports | Local info | Sport | BBC Kent | UK News | Polls | Advertise | Out and About | Site map

Free updates by Email  

News

[ Latest Stories | Categories | News Archive ]

Cross-channel bridge plans revealed

Posted by editor on Apr 02, 2007 - 09:10 AM
Filed under: Shipping, News

News

Driving to France for a little more than a fiver could have been a reality if a huge Channel suspension bridge had been given the go-ahead by the Thatcher government, official records have revealed.

After dismissing the option of a tunnel under the sea as "impractical", civil engineers submitted detailed proposal to construct a three-lane motorway between the two countries.

It was suggested the bridge, with a span of 21 miles and towering 220 feet above the busy sea lanes would carry cars and freight traffic between either Dover or Folkestone and the French coast.

Motorists, it was estimated, would pay a toll charge of £5.60 per person in their vehicle while lorry drivers could be charged £8 to use the route.

Engineers said that private financiers were willing to back the project, attracted by the forecast that tolls could provide a revenue of up to £220 million a year.

The bridge would have been built along the lines of the Severn Bridge that links South Wales and England at an estimated cost of £3 billion, said engineering group LinktoEurope.

LinktoEurope admitted that the huge pylons on which the bridge would rest could make navigation of the Channel difficult for shipping traffic. But they said that the structure would be sufficiently sturdy that, should a boat plough into the struts, traffic above would be unaffected.

The Government file on the proposals has been kept secret until today, when it was released at the National Archives at Kew.


 

Comments

Display Order
Bridge or causeway
by Lazarus
on Apr 02, 2007
[ _USERINFO ] [ _SENDAMSG ]

Dear Ed,

I read this article with interest. However, it is no surprise that there is little in the way of the large ideas, ideas that would really represent an investment for the future.

Given that the ferries and tunnel between them now barely cope with the trade, it would hardly be built before the bridge, also, would be out of capacity.

No. The large idea would be to construct a causeway, that is fill the channel in. It should not be too difficult, it is only about 40 metres (140 feet) deep and many of the grand dams in the USA are of the same size.

In the land so built we would offer locks so that shipping could still go up and down the channel, we could also use it as a land-fill site for all our rubbish; we could install a tidal power station in it (there is a net flow of mmillions of tonnes of seawater every day and this passes without doing any useful work at all; we could put the new major airports that the travelling public demand and finally, wouldn't it give jobs to thousands for years to come?

Yours optimistically,

Lazarus


Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in

 

Find it fast

  • Home
  • Just local news
  • Just letters
  • Just comments
  • News archive
  • About us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Search
 
 

 
 

 
 

+ Bookmark

Email us localrags@gmail.com


Please follow the instructions to add us to your bookmarks... Thank you...

 
 

Members

 

  • New account registration
  • Lost password recovery
 
 

Find your HOLIDAY bargains here!

 
 

Community Centre Specials!

 
 

Top Ten stories...

.....read more Stories...

 
 

VISIT US ON FACEBOOK.....

 

© 2012 Hawkinge Gazette. Design by Flashdaweb RSS RSS | Atom Atom | Terms of use | Contact | Zikula | YAML |